Object-universal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Object-universal''' (Skt. ''artha-sāmānya''; Tib. [[དོན་སྤྱི་]] | '''Object-universal''' (Skt. ''artha-sāmānya''; Tib. [[དོན་སྤྱི་]], ''dönchi'', [[Wyl.]] ''don spyi'') | ||
==Alternative Translations== | ==Alternative Translations== | ||
* | *general objective (Kapstein) | ||
*generic image (Hopkins)<ref>Matthew Kapstein says: "The term 'objective generality' is defined in a great many ways by later Tibetan thinkers. Recent interpreters of tibetan scholastic documents have sometimes used here the term 'generic image', but I think we should be on our guard lest we assimilate the concept to one of mental imagery." (p.91)</ref> | *generic image (Hopkins)<ref>Matthew Kapstein says: "The term 'objective generality' is defined in a great many ways by later Tibetan thinkers. Recent interpreters of tibetan scholastic documents have sometimes used here the term 'generic image', but I think we should be on our guard lest we assimilate the concept to one of mental imagery." (p.91)</ref> | ||
*idea | |||
*meaning-generality (Klein) | |||
*objective generality (Kapstein) | *objective generality (Kapstein) | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<small><references/></small> | <small><references/></small> | ||
==Internal Links== | |||
*[[Term-universal]] | |||
[[Category:Pramana]] | [[Category:Pramana]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:23, 21 January 2021
Object-universal (Skt. artha-sāmānya; Tib. དོན་སྤྱི་, dönchi, Wyl. don spyi)
Alternative Translations
- general objective (Kapstein)
- generic image (Hopkins)[1]
- idea
- meaning-generality (Klein)
- objective generality (Kapstein)
Notes
- ↑ Matthew Kapstein says: "The term 'objective generality' is defined in a great many ways by later Tibetan thinkers. Recent interpreters of tibetan scholastic documents have sometimes used here the term 'generic image', but I think we should be on our guard lest we assimilate the concept to one of mental imagery." (p.91)