Talk:Lion's Perfect Expressive Power: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Dear editors: I don't think we need to include Tib. and Wyl. references for all the words in a text, otherwise it becomes really difficult to read sentences. Since these terms (m…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Dear editors: I don't think we need to include Tib. and Wyl. references for all the words in a text, otherwise it becomes really difficult to read sentences. Since these terms (mengakde, seventeen tantras, etc.) have their own pages, I think it's sufficient to put Tib. and Wyl. references there... Do u agree? --[[User:Sébastien|Sébastien]] 09:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC) | Dear editors: I don't think we need to include Tib. and Wyl. references for all the words in a text, otherwise it becomes really difficult to read sentences. Since these terms (mengakde, seventeen tantras, etc.) have their own pages, I think it's sufficient to put Tib. and Wyl. references there... Do u agree? --[[User:Sébastien|Sébastien]] 09:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Yes. --[[User:Adam|adam]] 09:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:41, 28 December 2010
Dear editors: I don't think we need to include Tib. and Wyl. references for all the words in a text, otherwise it becomes really difficult to read sentences. Since these terms (mengakde, seventeen tantras, etc.) have their own pages, I think it's sufficient to put Tib. and Wyl. references there... Do u agree? --Sébastien 09:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. --adam 09:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)