User talk:Bill: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
p.s. Do you want to remove the links to booksellers, or put them an a special category? The advantage of the link is convenience, and being able to quickly read more on the topic. | p.s. Do you want to remove the links to booksellers, or put them an a special category? The advantage of the link is convenience, and being able to quickly read more on the topic. | ||
- Bill | - Bill | ||
:Hi, yes I think we should remove them. Occasionally we might want to link to the pubisher's own site, if the page contains extra material on the topic that really adds something, but we should not link to commercial booksellers. --[[User:Adam|Adam]] 04:17, 30 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
OK. I'll make the changes. | |||
Latest revision as of 09:25, 30 June 2007
Hi Bill,
Thanks for all that you are doing on Nagarjuna, etc. As a principle, can you prioritize listing the translations of texts under a heading of "Translations". If a book is not a translation of a text, but has relevant material we would put it under a heading of "Further Reading." The External Links should be reserved for links to articles, translations, etc., not for links to booksellers.
Thanks!
--Adam 03:40, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
recent changes
Hi Adam, Thanks for the clarification. I am generally trying to see you you do this and follow the same format. Still learning.
Still not exactly sure how to use these talk pages. - Bill
p.s. Do you want to remove the links to booksellers, or put them an a special category? The advantage of the link is convenience, and being able to quickly read more on the topic.
- Bill
- Hi, yes I think we should remove them. Occasionally we might want to link to the pubisher's own site, if the page contains extra material on the topic that really adds something, but we should not link to commercial booksellers. --Adam 04:17, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
OK. I'll make the changes.