Emptiness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Nagarjuna17.JPG|frame|Arya [[Nagarjuna]]]]'''Emptiness''' (Skt. ''śūnyatā''; Tib. ''tongpa nyi''; [[Wyl.]] ''stong pa nyid'') — the absence of inherent existence in all phenomena, which was explained by the [[Buddha]] in the [[sutra]]s of the [[three turnings|second turning of the Wheel of Dharma]], and further elaborated upon by masters such as [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Chandrakirti]]. | [[Image:Nagarjuna17.JPG|frame|Arya [[Nagarjuna]]]] | ||
'''Emptiness''' (Skt. ''śūnyatā''; Tib. ''tongpa nyi''; [[Wyl.]] ''stong pa nyid'') — the absence of inherent existence in all phenomena, which was explained by the [[Buddha]] in the [[sutra]]s of the [[three turnings|second turning of the Wheel of Dharma]], and further elaborated upon by masters such as [[Nagarjuna]] and [[Chandrakirti]]. | |||
[[Sogyal Rinpoche]] says: | [[Sogyal Rinpoche]] says: | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
==Alternative Translations== | ==Alternative Translations== | ||
*great emptiness | |||
*voidness—an absence of an impossible way of existing (Alexander Berzin). | *voidness—an absence of an impossible way of existing (Alexander Berzin). | ||
==Further Reading== | |||
*''A Treasury of Dharma'', aka ''The Mengak Study Pack'' (Lodève: The Tertön Sogyal Trust, 2005), pages 68-74. | |||
*[[Thinley Norbu]], ''The Small Golden Key'' (Shambhala Publications, 1999), ‘7. Great Emptiness'. | |||
[[Category:Key Terms]] | [[Category:Key Terms]] | ||
[[Category:Philosophical Tenets]] | [[Category:Philosophical Tenets]] |
Revision as of 18:50, 18 March 2010
Emptiness (Skt. śūnyatā; Tib. tongpa nyi; Wyl. stong pa nyid) — the absence of inherent existence in all phenomena, which was explained by the Buddha in the sutras of the second turning of the Wheel of Dharma, and further elaborated upon by masters such as Nagarjuna and Chandrakirti.
Sogyal Rinpoche says:
- "Unfortunately, the word ‘emptiness’, which is used to translate the Sanskrit term shunyata, carries a connotation of a nothing-ness, or a void. Happily, there is a wonderful definition in Tibetan that captures its true meaning: tak ché dang dralwa, which translates as: ‘free from permanence and non-existence'.
- Generally, all philosophies tend to fall into one of two extremes: ‘eternalism‘: believing in the existence or permanence of something, or ‘nihilism‘: believing in non-existence. Shunyata goes beyond both of these extremes, because it is neither permanent nor non-existing, and that is, ultimately, how things are."
The Analogy with Space
Shunyata is often compared to space, which is defined in Buddhism as the complete openness, or 'unobstructedness', which allows anything to occur. Likewise, because reality is 'empty' and not fixed in any way, it is said that anything is possible. As Nagarjuna said:
- To whomever emptiness is possible,
- All things are possible.
Subdivisions
The Emptiness of Emptiness
Nagarjuna does not put forward emptiness as another view about reality. In fact, he says:
- The victorious ones say that emptiness
- Undermines all dogmatic views,
- Those who take a dogmatic view of emptiness
- Are said to be incurable.
And:
- I prostrate to Gautama,
- Who, out of compassion,
- Taught the sacred Dharma
- That leads to the relinquishing of all views
Alternative Translations
- great emptiness
- voidness—an absence of an impossible way of existing (Alexander Berzin).
Further Reading
- A Treasury of Dharma, aka The Mengak Study Pack (Lodève: The Tertön Sogyal Trust, 2005), pages 68-74.
- Thinley Norbu, The Small Golden Key (Shambhala Publications, 1999), ‘7. Great Emptiness'.