Shastra: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Shastra''' (Skt. śāstra; Tib. ''tenchö''; [[wyl.]] ''bstan bcos'') - a treatise or commentary upon the words (Tib. ''ka''; Wyl. ''bka’'') of the Buddha. | '''Shastra''' (Skt. śāstra; Tib. ''tenchö''; [[wyl.]] ''bstan bcos'') - a '''treatise''' or commentary upon the words (Tib. ''ka''; Wyl. ''bka’'') of the Buddha. | ||
==Commentary== | |||
The ''Sūtra Requested by Devaputra'' says: | |||
:All Dharma teachings are included within the Buddha’s word and the treatises, | |||
:The excellent speech and the commentaries on its intended meaning, | |||
:By means of these, the teaching of the Shakya | |||
:Will remain for long within this world. | |||
As this says, all the excellent teachings of the Dharma can be included within two categories: the speech of the victorious Buddha and the treatises which provide commentaries on its intended meaning. | |||
[[Vasubandhu]] said: | |||
:That which subdues all the enemies, one’s own afflictions, | |||
:And guards against future existence in the lower realms, | |||
:Is called a ‘treatise’, because it subdues and protects, | |||
:These two features are not found in other traditions. | |||
:--''Well Explained Reasoning'' | |||
[[Patrul Rinpoche]] says: | |||
:There are four obstacles which can prevent those with understanding from taking interest in a particular treatise. They are: | |||
:#thinking that it is devoid of any purpose, | |||
:#thinking that it has a purpose but that one would never be able to accomplish it, | |||
:#thinking that although possible it is not something an honourable person would wish to pursue, or | |||
:#thinking that even though it is honourable, there are other easier methods or that there is a lack of connection (between the methods and the goal). | |||
:In the present case, if we take each of these in turn, then: | |||
:#unlike a treatise on dentistry for crows, for example, generally there is some purpose to it. | |||
:#Furthermore that purpose is achievable, so it is not like a treatise on stealing the crown jewel from the naga king. | |||
:#Not only that, but the aim, which is achievable, is also a sublime aim for individuals to pursue, so it is not like a treatise on how to :marry your mother. | |||
:#Then, it is not that the methods for accomplishing this supreme objective bear no relation to what is in the treatise, like sacrificing animals in order to gain rebirth in the higher realms. | |||
::--From ''An Overview of The Ornament of Clear Realization, the Treatise of Essential Instructions on Transcendental Wisdom'' | |||
==External links== | |||
*[http://www.lotsawahouse.org/shenganotes.html Notes from the Miscellaneous Writings of Khenpo Shenga] | |||
[[Category:Key Terms]] | [[Category:Key Terms]] | ||
[[Category:Texts]] |
Revision as of 07:30, 30 June 2007
Shastra (Skt. śāstra; Tib. tenchö; wyl. bstan bcos) - a treatise or commentary upon the words (Tib. ka; Wyl. bka’) of the Buddha.
Commentary
The Sūtra Requested by Devaputra says:
- All Dharma teachings are included within the Buddha’s word and the treatises,
- The excellent speech and the commentaries on its intended meaning,
- By means of these, the teaching of the Shakya
- Will remain for long within this world.
As this says, all the excellent teachings of the Dharma can be included within two categories: the speech of the victorious Buddha and the treatises which provide commentaries on its intended meaning.
Vasubandhu said:
- That which subdues all the enemies, one’s own afflictions,
- And guards against future existence in the lower realms,
- Is called a ‘treatise’, because it subdues and protects,
- These two features are not found in other traditions.
- --Well Explained Reasoning
Patrul Rinpoche says:
- There are four obstacles which can prevent those with understanding from taking interest in a particular treatise. They are:
- thinking that it is devoid of any purpose,
- thinking that it has a purpose but that one would never be able to accomplish it,
- thinking that although possible it is not something an honourable person would wish to pursue, or
- thinking that even though it is honourable, there are other easier methods or that there is a lack of connection (between the methods and the goal).
- In the present case, if we take each of these in turn, then:
- unlike a treatise on dentistry for crows, for example, generally there is some purpose to it.
- Furthermore that purpose is achievable, so it is not like a treatise on stealing the crown jewel from the naga king.
- Not only that, but the aim, which is achievable, is also a sublime aim for individuals to pursue, so it is not like a treatise on how to :marry your mother.
- Then, it is not that the methods for accomplishing this supreme objective bear no relation to what is in the treatise, like sacrificing animals in order to gain rebirth in the higher realms.
- --From An Overview of The Ornament of Clear Realization, the Treatise of Essential Instructions on Transcendental Wisdom