Three modes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'The '''three modes''' (Tib. ཚུལ་གསུམ་; Wyl. ''tshul gsum'') of a logical argument are as follows: #the reason must be a feature of the subject (''phyog…') |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (''rjes khyab'') | #there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (''rjes khyab'') | ||
#there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (''ldog khyab'') | #there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (''ldog khyab'') | ||
==Alternative Translations== | |||
*Threefold criteria | |||
[[Category:Pramana]] | [[Category:Pramana]] | ||
[[Category:03-Three]] | [[Category:03-Three]] | ||
[[Category:Enumerations]] | [[Category:Enumerations]] | ||
Revision as of 11:05, 3 April 2011
The three modes (Tib. ཚུལ་གསུམ་; Wyl. tshul gsum) of a logical argument are as follows:
- the reason must be a feature of the subject (phyogs chos)
- there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (rjes khyab)
- there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (ldog khyab)
Alternative Translations
- Threefold criteria