Three modes: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:34, 25 November 2017

The three modes (Skt. trairūpya; Tib. ཚུལ་གསུམ་; tsul sum, Wyl. tshul gsum) of a logical argument are as follows:

the reason must be a feature of the subject (pakṣadharma; ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་, phyogs chos)
there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (anvayavyāpti; རྗེས་ཁྱབ་, rjes khyab)
there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (vyatirekavyāpti; ལྡོག་ཁྱབ་, ldog khyab)

Revision as of 10:58, 4 April 2011 (view source) Adam (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:34, 25 November 2017 (view source) Kent (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''three modes''' (Skt. ''trairūpya''; Tib. [[ཚུལ་གསུམ་]]; [[Wyl.]] ''tshul gsum'') of a logical argument are as follows:		The '''three modes''' (Skt. ''trairūpya''; Tib. [[ཚུལ་གསུམ་]]; ''tsul sum'', [[Wyl.]] ''tshul gsum'') of a logical argument are as follows:

	#the reason must be a feature of the subject (''pakṣadharma''; [[ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་]], ''phyogs chos'')		#the reason must be a feature of the subject (''pakṣadharma''; [[ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་]], ''phyogs chos'')