Two truths: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:As this says, any coarse thing which can be smashed to pieces with a hammer or dissected into parts by the mind, so that the mind which apprehended that coarse appearance no longer identifies it as such, belongs to the '''[[relative truth]]'''. Then concerning the absolute, any coarse material thing or state of consciousness can be broken down into its ultimate constituents, which are individual particles or moments. Therefore the [[partless particles]], which are the ultimate constituents of coarser things, and the [[indivisible moments of consciousness]], which are the ultimate constituents of mental phenomena, are said to be '''[[absolute truth]]'''. | :As this says, any coarse thing which can be smashed to pieces with a hammer or dissected into parts by the mind, so that the mind which apprehended that coarse appearance no longer identifies it as such, belongs to the '''[[relative truth]]'''. Then concerning the absolute, any coarse material thing or state of consciousness can be broken down into its ultimate constituents, which are individual particles or moments. Therefore the [[partless particles]], which are the ultimate constituents of coarser things, and the [[indivisible moments of consciousness]], which are the ultimate constituents of mental phenomena, are said to be '''[[absolute truth]]'''. | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
Revision as of 08:07, 10 August 2007
Two truths (Wyl. bden pa gnyis) - Everything has an absolute aspect, or absolute truth, and a relative aspect, or relative truth. The absolute or ultimate is the inherent nature of everything, how things really are. The conventional or relative is how things appear. In the teachings, these are known as ‘the two truths’, but they are not to be understood as two separate dimensions, rather as two aspects of a single reality.
The Vaibhashika View of the Two Truths
Khenpo Ngakchung says:
- The Abhidharmakosha says:
- Things which, when destroyed or mentally dissected,
- Can no longer be identified by the mind,
- Such as pots or water, are relative;
- All else besides is ultimately existent.
- Treasury of Abhidharma, VI, 4
- Things which, when destroyed or mentally dissected,
- As this says, any coarse thing which can be smashed to pieces with a hammer or dissected into parts by the mind, so that the mind which apprehended that coarse appearance no longer identifies it as such, belongs to the relative truth. Then concerning the absolute, any coarse material thing or state of consciousness can be broken down into its ultimate constituents, which are individual particles or moments. Therefore the partless particles, which are the ultimate constituents of coarser things, and the indivisible moments of consciousness, which are the ultimate constituents of mental phenomena, are said to be absolute truth.