Three modes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''three modes''' (Skt. ''trairūpya''; Tib. [[ཚུལ་གསུམ་]]; ''tsul sum'', [[Wyl.]] ''tshul gsum'') of a logical argument are as follows: | The '''three modes''' (Skt. ''trairūpya''; Tib. [[ཚུལ་གསུམ་]]; ''tsul sum'', [[Wyl.]] ''tshul gsum'') of a logical argument are as follows: | ||
#the reason must be a feature of the subject (''pakṣadharma''; [[ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་]], ''phyogs chos'') | #the reason must be a feature of the subject (Skt. ''pakṣadharma''; Tib. [[ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་]], Wyl. ''phyogs chos'') | ||
#there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (''anvayavyāpti''; [[རྗེས་ཁྱབ་]], ''rjes khyab'') | #there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (Skt. ''anvayavyāpti''; Tib. [[རྗེས་ཁྱབ་]], Wyl. ''rjes khyab'') | ||
#there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (''vyatirekavyāpti''; [[ལྡོག་ཁྱབ་]], ''ldog khyab'') | #there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (Skt. ''vyatirekavyāpti''; Tib. [[ལྡོག་ཁྱབ་]], Wyl. ''ldog khyab'') | ||
==Alternative Translations== | ==Alternative Translations== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:29, 3 May 2018
The three modes (Skt. trairūpya; Tib. ཚུལ་གསུམ་; tsul sum, Wyl. tshul gsum) of a logical argument are as follows:
- the reason must be a feature of the subject (Skt. pakṣadharma; Tib. ཕྱོགས་ཆོས་, Wyl. phyogs chos)
- there must be positive logical pervasion (or positive concomitance or entailment) (Skt. anvayavyāpti; Tib. རྗེས་ཁྱབ་, Wyl. rjes khyab)
- there must be negative logical pervasion (or negative concomitance) (Skt. vyatirekavyāpti; Tib. ལྡོག་ཁྱབ་, Wyl. ldog khyab)
Alternative Translations
- Threefold criteria