Talk:Tröma Nakmo (Dudjom): Difference between revisions
Yeshedorje (talk | contribs) m (Created page with 'Seb,about the "Further reading" sections. The recently published book includes two texts: one (the commentary) written by Pema Lungtok Gyatso, another one written by Dudjom Lingp…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Seb,about the "Further reading" sections. The recently published book includes two texts: one (the commentary) written by Pema Lungtok Gyatso, another one written by Dudjom Lingpa himself (song to Sarah), which is why I had put two links, and not one. http://www.berotsana.org/dl-chod/ We should keep two links, no? — --[[User:Yeshedorje|Yeshedorje]] 21:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | Seb,about the "Further reading" sections. The recently published book includes two texts: one (the commentary) written by Pema Lungtok Gyatso, another one written by Dudjom Lingpa himself (song to Sarah), which is why I had put two links, and not one. http://www.berotsana.org/dl-chod/ We should keep two links, no? — --[[User:Yeshedorje|Yeshedorje]] 21:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
I find it quite problematic that a page like Troma Nakmo is dedicated to a practice of the Dudjom Tersar. There should be a general page on Troma Nakmo. There are many practices of Troma Nakmo, most famously one by Nyangral Nyima Ozer. That one is much much more important than this Dudjom practice, which is only very recent. | |||
Now this gives a false impression that the Dudjom tersar is the one and only tradition in Tibetan and Indian Buddhism. I'm sure quite a few other pages are like this as well and this really needs to change. --[[User:Hankop|Hankop]] ([[User talk:Hankop|talk]]) 07:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:42, 12 May 2019
Seb,about the "Further reading" sections. The recently published book includes two texts: one (the commentary) written by Pema Lungtok Gyatso, another one written by Dudjom Lingpa himself (song to Sarah), which is why I had put two links, and not one. http://www.berotsana.org/dl-chod/ We should keep two links, no? — --Yeshedorje 21:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
I find it quite problematic that a page like Troma Nakmo is dedicated to a practice of the Dudjom Tersar. There should be a general page on Troma Nakmo. There are many practices of Troma Nakmo, most famously one by Nyangral Nyima Ozer. That one is much much more important than this Dudjom practice, which is only very recent.
Now this gives a false impression that the Dudjom tersar is the one and only tradition in Tibetan and Indian Buddhism. I'm sure quite a few other pages are like this as well and this really needs to change. --Hankop (talk) 07:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)