Determination: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Alternative translations== | ==Alternative translations== | ||
*inclusive decision and eliminative decision (Tony Duff) | *inclusive decision and eliminative decision (Tony Duff) | ||
*(''rnam bcad'') preclusion | |||
*(''rnam bcad'') exclusion (Padmakara Translation Group) | *(''rnam bcad'') exclusion (Padmakara Translation Group) | ||
*(''yongs gcod'') detection (Padmakara Translation Group) | *(''yongs gcod'') detection (Padmakara Translation Group) | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 16 March 2017
There are two ways of determining an object or a fact: positive determination (Tib. ཡོངས་གཅོད་, Wyl. yongs gcod) and negative determination (Tib. རྣམ་གཅོད་, Wyl. rnam bcad). Negative determination is a process where ‘the nature of a thing is known [indirectly] through the elimination of what are not the thing’ and positive determination is where ‘the nature of a thing is [directly] affirmed and by doing so, what are not the thing are eliminated’.[1]
In the case of a vase, for example, positive determination would be the determination that the vase is impermanent. Negative determination would be the determination that the vase is not permanent. In the context of the rope-seen-as-a-snake example, the negation of the rope's being a snake is a rnam bcad. The affirmation of the rope's being a rope is a yongs gcod.[2]
References
- ↑ Karma Phuntsho, Mipham's Dialectics and the Debate on Emptiness. p. 170. Published by Routledge Curzon, 2005. ISBN 0–415–35252–5 (Print Edition)
- ↑ See Great Tibetan Dictionary – Tyler Dewar's translation.
Alternative translations
- inclusive decision and eliminative decision (Tony Duff)
- (rnam bcad) preclusion
- (rnam bcad) exclusion (Padmakara Translation Group)
- (yongs gcod) detection (Padmakara Translation Group)
Further Reading
- Mipham's Adornment of the Middle Way, pp.275-277. Published by Shambhala 2005, ISBN 1-59030-241-9