Talk:Arhat: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "~~~~ There are many other classifications of Arhats, I assume but didn't want to rewrite this as I'm not 100% sure the classification here is dgra bcom pa lhag bcas (arhat wit...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Kent|Kent]] ([[User talk:Kent|talk]]) 01:00, 2 February 2017 (CET) There are many other classifications of Arhats, I assume but didn't want to rewrite this as I'm not 100% sure the classification here is dgra bcom pa lhag bcas (arhat with residual traces) and dgra bcom pa lhag med (arhat with no residual traces.) | [[User:Kent|Kent]] ([[User talk:Kent|talk]]) 01:00, 2 February 2017 (CET) There are many other classifications of Arhats, I assume but didn't want to rewrite this as I'm not 100% sure the classification here is dgra bcom pa lhag bcas (arhat with residual traces) and dgra bcom pa lhag med (arhat with no residual traces.) | ||
Hi Kent, you are completely right and I was about to change this. Actually, from the hinayana point of view there does not even exist such a person as an arhat without remainder! this is from the MY point of view. I will edit this soon. --[[User:Hankop|Hankop]] ([[User talk:Hankop|talk]]) 03:18, 2 February 2017 (CET) |
Revision as of 02:18, 2 February 2017
Kent (talk) 01:00, 2 February 2017 (CET) There are many other classifications of Arhats, I assume but didn't want to rewrite this as I'm not 100% sure the classification here is dgra bcom pa lhag bcas (arhat with residual traces) and dgra bcom pa lhag med (arhat with no residual traces.)
Hi Kent, you are completely right and I was about to change this. Actually, from the hinayana point of view there does not even exist such a person as an arhat without remainder! this is from the MY point of view. I will edit this soon. --Hankop (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2017 (CET)