Four criteria of validity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→External Links) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''four criteria of validity''' (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་) are: | The '''four criteria of validity''' (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་, ''tsema shyi'', [[Wyl.]] ''tshad ma bzhi '') are: | ||
#valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་, | #valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. ''lung tshad ma'') | ||
#valid [[shastra|commentaries]] (Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. ''bstan bcos tshad ma'') | #valid [[shastra|commentaries]] (Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. ''bstan bcos tshad ma'') | ||
#valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. ''bla ma tshad ma'') | #valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. ''bla ma tshad ma'') | ||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 26 May 2018
The four criteria of validity (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་, tsema shyi, Wyl. tshad ma bzhi ) are:
- valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. lung tshad ma)
- valid commentaries (Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. bstan bcos tshad ma)
- valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. bla ma tshad ma)
- valid experience (Tib. ཉམས་མཉོང་ཚད་མ་, Wyl. nyams myong tshad ma)[1]
References
- ↑ Note 6 by Adam Pearcey to translation on Lotsawa House of The Sage's Harmonious Song of Truth', 'A Prayer for the Flourishing of the Non-Sectarian Teachings of the Buddha by His Holiness the Dalai Lama
Alternative Translations
- Four means of validation (Philogia Tibetica)