Four criteria of validity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Four criteria of validity''' (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་) | '''Four criteria of validity''' (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་) | ||
#valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་ , '' | #valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་ , [[Wyl.]] ''lung tshad ma'') | ||
#valid commentaries ((Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་ , '' | #valid commentaries ((Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. ''bstan bcos tshad ma'') | ||
#valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་ , '' | #valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. ''bla ma tshad ma'') | ||
#valid experience (Tib. ཉམས་མཉོང་ཚད་མ་ , '' | #valid experience (Tib. ཉམས་མཉོང་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. ''nyams myong tshad ma'')<ref>Note 6 by Adam Pearcey to translation on Lotsawa House of ''The Sage's Harmonious Song of Truth', 'A Prayer for the Flourishing of the Non-Sectarian Teachings of the Buddha'' by His Holiness the Dalai Lama</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 1 March 2015
Four criteria of validity (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་)
- valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. lung tshad ma)
- valid commentaries ((Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. bstan bcos tshad ma)
- valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. bla ma tshad ma)
- valid experience (Tib. ཉམས་མཉོང་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. nyams myong tshad ma)[1]
References
- ↑ Note 6 by Adam Pearcey to translation on Lotsawa House of The Sage's Harmonious Song of Truth', 'A Prayer for the Flourishing of the Non-Sectarian Teachings of the Buddha by His Holiness the Dalai Lama
Alternative Translations
- Four means of validation (Philogia Tibetica)