Four criteria of validity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*[http://philologia-tibetica.blogspot.fr/2013/03/blog-post_4.html|Philogia Tibetica] | *[http://philologia-tibetica.blogspot.fr/2013/03/blog-post_4.html|Philogia Tibetica] | ||
[[ | [[Category: Pramana]] | ||
[[Category: Enumerations]] | [[Category: Enumerations]] | ||
[[Category: 04-Four]] | [[Category: 04-Four]] | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 1 March 2015
Four criteria of validity (Tib. ཚད་མ་བཞི་)
- valid scripture (Tib. ལུང་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. lung tshad ma)
- valid commentaries ((Tib. བསྟན་བཅོས་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. bstan bcos tshad ma)
- valid teachers (Tib. བླ་མ་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. bla ma tshad ma)
- valid experience (Tib. ཉམས་མཉོང་ཚད་མ་ , Wyl. nyams myong tshad ma)[1]
References
- ↑ Note 6 by Adam Pearcey to translation on Lotsawa House of The Sage's Harmonious Song of Truth', 'A Prayer for the Flourishing of the Non-Sectarian Teachings of the Buddha by His Holiness the Dalai Lama
Alternative Translations
- Four means of validation (Philogia Tibetica)