Four great logical arguments of the Middle Way: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*[http://www.lotsawahouse.org/fourarguments.html The Four Great Logical Arguments of the Middle Way by Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche] | *[http://www.lotsawahouse.org/fourarguments.html The Four Great Logical Arguments of the Middle Way by Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche] | ||
[[Category:Philosophical Tenets]] | [[Category:Philosophical Tenets]] | ||
[[Category:Madhyamika]] | [[Category:Madhyamika]] | ||
[[Category:Enumerations]] | |||
[[Category:4-Four]] |
Revision as of 14:14, 22 May 2009
The four great logical arguments of the Middle Way (Wyl. dbu ma'i gtan tshigs chen po bzhi) are:
- The investigation of the cause: the Diamond Splinters
- The investigation of the result: refuting existent or non-existent results
- The investigation of the essential identity: ‘neither one nor many’
- The investigation of all: the Great Interdependence
Sometimes it is said that there are ‘five great arguments of the Middle Way,’ but, according to Mipham Rinpoche, the fifth — the investigation of both the cause and the effect: refuting production according to the four alternatives — can be included within the first category, i.e., the investigation of the cause.
See also Madhyamika.